How to share user folder without password? Sir. Thanxalot check out http: //tech. If sharing C: \user\{account- name} still doesn’t work after using the guide in that link try sharing something other than C: \user\{account- name} . Try something like c: \testshare. Check the permissions on that folder and make sure that “everyone” has access. If successful then move on to troubleshooting the C: \user\{account- name} share. You may be dealing with permission problems on C: \user\{account- name}. Vista sets permissions for these directories based on the account each is created for. You may need to add "everyone" to the permissions for the share to work without a password. I found your post while troubleshooting a similar issue. I am working on a PC that previously worked and stopped allowing open shares after a rebuild. I have a personal Vista system does not have any issues sharing without a password. Good Luck. As for Malke, I have to disagree. I think its Malke that must not understand networking and infrastructures that require to be configured in ways he cannot understand. I am sick of closed minded network and system admins that post here just to impose their paranoid security beliefs and try to prove that everyone else is beneath them. If these type of people actually get a job in IT they can cost companies tons of money by being too close minded and too "no that’s not possible or the way I think it should be". Create the same username with the same password in other computer. or this post may help. Vista file sharing problem without. Vista file sharing problem without. Share files with someone. of Windows earlier than Windows Vista. For example, you can't share the root of your C. Public folder, you don't share them.
Meanwhile living in their own little uber secure locked down world that sacrifices functionality for what they think is best for others. I am not saying that everyone should to open up their networks or stop using the best security practices. I am saying that there is middle ground and not every scenario fits the "make it so secure it's broken" category. It comes down to risk vs. I am a IT manager/systems admin and have worked in IT for 1. I have seen my share of admins that answer every new request with “no” only to become hated and labeled as an IT Nazi. In the end they get paid to do exactly what they said wasn’t possible or was not an acceptable request according to the way they had been trained. The successful admins keep open minds and do not belittle others that ask questions. The computer world will continue to evolve and will pass you by if you can't relax and think outside of the box. Beating up home and "end- users" on forums doesn’t make you better than them. Attacking security expert Nazis does though. Malke, Is it really your place to tell someone that they have already been "told" what their options are. Why the anger? This person isn’t three years old! Sir. Thanxalot didn’t argue or even comment after being "told" one possible solution? And if he does, I think it will be ok since this is a forum where people discuss topics. If he decides to continue to look for a better solution the world will continue to spin. I sure am glad I live in the USA where people are allowed to choose for themselves, ask questions when needed, or even post annoying comments like the one I am typing now . What country are you from and did you have to pay to have your head inserted up your backside or is it required by law at birth? Who are you to try and justify that Microsoft restricted functionality in order to enforce what you believe to be a best practice. I have no problem if a new OS or forum poster like yourself tries to help a user be more secure. New features can be great and nothing is wrong with helping people understand why a process that they may have used in the past is no longer their only option and that it may not be the best option moving forward. But, completely removing the ability to create an open share in Vista is unacceptable and based on the number of posts out there I think many others agree. There are many scenarios where sharing files without password on Vista is valid. Sure there are more secure ways to share data but this has been an available feature that is no longer working as it did before Vista. Let’s pretend that Malke has friends and doesn’t live with his mom. Since he will always live with his mom we will make an exception and pretend that his imaginary friends visit him there. Lets also pretend that Malke has brilliant ideas that he put into the form of files. When Malke's imaginary friends visit he shows them his new super cool files and everyone his happy. Malke decides he wants to share these files via his Vista desktop. This will allow his imaginary friends to access them from their laptops and even copy the files to use later. Malke tries to set this up in Vista and it doesn’t work as planned. Malke now has a dilemma. Vista says he has to put them in the public folders to share with visitors or use password protection on custom shares. Malke has lots of files in various places. Some on a large USB drive and others in different directories that he has organized. Malke would prefer to create shares to allow access that he can control, share without password protection, and customize as needed. Vista's public folder solution doesn’t fit his needs. Malke cries for his mom to help and she tells him “I don’t know what happened, it worked fine in XP” and then reminds Malke that it is almost bedtime and that his boyfriends need to put their clothes back on and head home. Since this works in XP and every other modern Windows OS he asks about it in a Vista forum. Real world Malke responds to his post treating him like an idiot. According to real world Commie Malke, he has already been "TOLD" that he needs to create similar accounts on each of his imaginary friends systems in order to share his work. Imaginary Malke cries himself to sleep. He ends up asking his mom to reinstall XP and is now afraid to ask for anymore help online. Any person that wants to share files with other network systems including ones that are not their own. These users should not be required to create accounts on every system needing access especially if they do not own them. Many users simply want to provide a read only share that everyone on their network can access. If they decide that full access is needed it should be an option. If needed they can restrict access via their physical or wireless connections. Sure there are people that leave their default Linksys and Dlink wireless networks open but the OS shouldn’t be built just for them removing features that others need. Consultants that want to share data during meetings or group projects without using USB drives or CD media. Sure there are thousands of ways to share data but if they want an open share that should be one of the options. If it is such a bad thing then why was it a working feature prior to Vista. Are you saying that Microsoft did not understand networking up until they wrote Vista? I guess they changed their minds again since Server 2. Vista and still allows anonymous shares just like the previous Windows Server versions. You are obviously looking at shared resources from a corporate security standpoint. How do explain the fact that this is only a problem in Vista and works fine for Server 2. If it is to protect businesses from their users creating shares on corporate Vista desktops then that is easily controlled with group policies. I don't think MS meant to remove non- password sharing. If so, they should not have options to turn on and off password protected sharing. The verbiage for this setting is confusing to most. It is not clear if turning it off allows sharing without passwords or if it means you can only share with this option is on and it requires password protection in doing so. Since there is a separate file sharing option that must be enabled, turning on the password protected sharing should not be required. Either way here is a link detailing one person's guide to open shares on Vista. Microsoft's explanation for the share settings in Vista.: http: //technet. The MS Technet article states the following: "When you disable password protected sharing, the computer sharing the folder does not require a user account or password. Anyone on your network can access the shared folders of the computer (provided the folder was shared for the Guest or Everyone account). This behavior is equivalent to simple file sharing in Windows XP."As we already know this is not always the case. Many users are having problems getting this to work even with the feature disabled. My personal experience is that the new sharing features are buggy. The results are inconsistent when trying to create open shares. Based on personal experience and comments in other threads it seems to work on one Vista system but not another when there is no obvious difference between the settings. I found this thread while troubleshooting a 6. Vista PC. The same PC did not have problems with open shares before a recent rebuild. Non- password protected sharing is a requirement for the setup as it hosts data provided for visiting volunteers that are working on a non- profit project. The volunteers connect to a private network with personal laptops and then access the share as needed. The setup needs to remain simple and doesn't warrant the purchase of a server or intranet website to host the data. XP had been used for years and worked flawlessly. Sir. Thanxalot wrote: > Hi,> I'm trying to share the C: \user\{account- name} folder.> When trying to access the folder on my laptop i get the following error> message: > > You might not have permission to use this> network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if> you have access permissions. Multiple connections to a server or shared> resource by the same user, using more than one user name, are not allowed.> Disconnect all previous connections to the server or shared resource and> try again.> > File sharing is turned on password protection turned off.> > I've read in various threads that it's not possible to share the user> folder without the same account names and password protewction.> Is that really true?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2016
Categories |